Should physicians pursue success through egoism or patient welfare

A great deal of progress has been made in recent decades in changing the culture of research to incorporate more fully this ethical responsibility into protocol design and implementation. In the s and s, a series of scandals concerning social science research and medical research conducted with the sick and the illiterate underlined the need to systematically and rigorously protect individuals in research Beecher ; Faden and Beauchamp ; Jones ; Katz ; Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel It is a patchwork arrangement associated with the receipt of federal research funding or the regulatory review and approval of new drugs and devices. In addition, it depends on the voluntary cooperation of investigators, research institutions, and professional societies across a wide array of research disciplines.

Should physicians pursue success through egoism or patient welfare

Should physicians pursue success through egoism or patient welfare

Egoism has two variants, descriptive or normative. The descriptive or positive variant conceives egoism as a factual description of human affairs. That is, people are motivated by their own interests and desires, and they cannot be described otherwise.

The normative variant proposes that people should be so motivated, regardless of what presently motivates their behavior.

Altruism is the opposite of egoism. The term egoism derives from ego, the Latin term for I in English.

Google+ Badge

Egoism should be distinguished from egotism, which means a psychological overvaluation of ones own importance, or of ones own activities.

People act for many reasons; but for whom, or what, do or should they actfor themselves, for God, or for the good of the planet? Can an individual ever act only according to her own interests without regard for others interests.

Conversely, can an individual ever truly act for others in complete disregard for her own interests? The answers will depend on an account of free will. Some philosophers argue that an individual has no choice in these matters, claiming that a persons acts are determined by prior events which make illusory any belief in choice.

Nevertheless, if an element of choice is permitted against the great causal impetus from nature, or God, it follows that a person possesses some control over her next action, and, that, therefore, one may inquire as to whether the individual does, or, should choose a self-or-other-oriented action.

Morally speaking, one can ask whether the individual should pursue her own interests, or, whether she should reject self-interest and pursue others interest instead: The descriptive egoists theory is called psychological egoism.

Psychological egoism describes human nature as being wholly self-centered and self-motivated. Examples of this explanation of human nature predate the formation of the theory, and, are found in writings such as that of British Victorian historian, Macaulay, and, in that of British Reformation political philosopher, Thomas Hobbes.

To the question, What proposition is there respecting human nature which is absolutely and universally true? Opponents claim that psychological egoism renders ethics useless. However, this accusation assumes that ethical behavior is necessarily other-regarding, which opponents would first have to establish.

Opponents may also exploit counterfactual evidence to criticize psychological egoism surely, they claim, there is a host of evidence supporting altruistic or duty bound actions that cannot be said to engage the self-interest of the agent. However, what qualifies to be counted as apparent counterfactual evidence by opponents becomes an intricate and debatable issue.

This is because, in response to their opponents, psychological egoists may attempt to shift the question away from outward appearances to ultimate motives of acting benevolently towards others; for example, they may claim that seemingly altruistic behavior giving a stranger some money necessarily does have a self-interested component.

For example, if the individual were not to offer aid to a stranger, he or she may feel guilty or may look bad in front of a peer group. On this point, psychological egoisms validity turns on examining and analyzing moral motivation.

But since motivation is inherently private and inaccessible to others an agent could be lying to herself or to others about the original motivethe theory shifts from a theoretical description of human nature—one that can be put to observational testing—to an assumption about the inner workings of human nature: A closed theory is a theory that rejects competing theories on its own terms and is non-verifiable and non-falsifiable.

If psychological egoism is reduced to an assumption concerning human nature and its hidden motives, then it follows that it is just as valid to hold a competing theory of human motivation such as psychological altruism.

Psychological altruism holds that all human action is necessarily other-centered, and other-motivated. Ones becoming a hermit an apparently selfish act can be reinterpreted through psychological altruism as an act of pure noble selflessness: A parallel analysis of psychological altruism thus results in opposing conclusions to psychological egoism.

However, psychological altruism is arguably just as closed as psychological egoism: If both theories can be validly maintained, and if the choice between them becomes the flip of a coin, then their soundness must be questioned.

Should physicians pursue success through egoism or patient welfare

A weak version of psychological egoism accepts the possibility of altruistic or benevolent behavior, but maintains that, whenever a choice is made by an agent to act, the action is by definition one that the agent wants to do at that point.

The action is self-serving, and is therefore sufficiently explained by the theory of psychological egoism.The Importance Of Integrity And Ethical Principles - Integrity is the adherence to moral and ethical principles and is a term that is encorporated into many different aspects of life such as business, relationships, and society (, ).

All of these philosophies depend on the idea that humans normally do or should pursue their own welfare and happiness. fallacies in her position of ethical egoism. Also, they should consider the current occupant of the White House, a perfect example of egoism run amok.

bottom structure and that ethical leadership should be reflected in. Start studying Ethics in Healthcare Baylor Army. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Psychological egoism- all persons act on what they perceive will produce their best interest/ selfishly The likelihood of success is very small; patient's quality of life is unacceptable; prospective benefit.

The coach values the team's success over the welfare of the individual athletes. done but that the decision of what should be done should be left to the patient.8 Veatch He states that.

For Your Own Good ; Moreover, the ability to make choices that promote our well-being is a capacity one acquires and improves only through practice. individuals are the best judges of their own interests and so should be left free to pursue them.

Mill writes: "With respect to his own feelings and circumstances, the most ordinary man or. Meta-ethics is the branch of philosophical ethics that asks how we understand, know about, and what we mean when we talk about what is right and what is wrong.

An ethical question pertaining to a particular practical situation—such as, "Should I eat this particular piece of chocolate cake?"—cannot be a meta-ethical question (rather, this is an applied ethical question).

Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? by Michael Sandel | Saša Rađenović -